Selasa, 11 Oktober 2011

INTERACTIVE MULTIMEDIA TEACHING OF ACCOUNTING INFORMATION SYSTEM (AIS) CYCLES: STUDENT PERCEPTIONS AND
VIEWS
WORKING PAPER No. 2003-006
Trevor Stanley
School of Accountancy
Queensland University of Technology
Australia
Pam Edwards
Office of Higher Education
Queensland Department of Education
Australia
Please address all further enquiries to:
Trevor Stanley
Queensland University of Technology
School of Accountancy
George St
BRISBANE Q 4000
Australia
Phone: 61 7 3864 5291
Fax: 61 7 3864 1812
The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial assistance provided by a Queensland University of Technology (QUT) Teaching and Learning Large Grant.

INTERACTIVE MULTIMEDIA TEACHING OF ACCOUNTING INFORMATION SYSTEM (AIS) CYCLES: STUDENT PERCEPTIONS AND
VIEWS
ABSTRACT
This paper describes the design and development of a CD ROM intended to assist students’ learning by bringing a sense of reality to the concepts studied in relation to Accounting Information Systems cycles. The educational design is underpinned by constructivist theories of learning which espouse the benefits of experiential learning in facilitating effective student learning. Three Australian companies - Warner Brothers Movie World, Golden Circle and Zupps Parts – are featured on the CD ROM to provide virtual ‘experiential learning experiences’ for students. An extensive evaluation of the CD ROM was conducted, involving both qualitative and quantitative methodologies, to ascertain students’ perceived value of the CD ROM to assist their learning. Results indicate that the CD ROM offered students a real life understanding of applicable concepts and that students were receptive to learning in online environments which are appropriately designed and constructed.
Key Words:  Accounting Education, Technology in Education, Accounting CD ROM, Multimedia, Experiential learning
Finally, ascertaining the views of employers and/or business groups with respect to the effectiveness of the CD ROM in developing students’ employability skills and enhancing learning outcomes, in particular developing understanding of key accounting concepts, would be useful given the increased focus on employability skills in Australian higher education.
References
Ballantyne, R., Borthwick, J. and Packer, J. (2000). Beyond Student Evaluation of Teaching: Identifying and Addressing Academic Staff Development Needs. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 25(3), 221-236.
Biggs, J. (1999). Teaching for Quality Learning at University. The Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press: Buckingham.
Centra, J.A. (1993). Reflective Faculty Evaluation. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
Coaldrake, P. & Stedman, L. (1998). On the Brink: Australia’s Universities Confronting their Future. St Lucia: UQP.
Collins, A. (1988). Cognitive apprenticeship and instructional technology (Technical Report No. 6899). BBN Labs Inc., Cambridge, MA.
Herrington, J. and Oliver, R. (2000). An Instructional Design Framework for Authentic Learning Environments. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 48(3), 23-48.
Holcomb, T., and Michaelsen, R. (1996). A Strategic Plan for Educational
Technology in Accounting. Journal of Accounting Education, 14(3), 277-292.
Kirk, D. and McDonald, D. (1998). Situated Learning in Physical Education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 17, 376-397.
Lave, J. and Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Marsh, H. and Dunkin, M. (1992). Students’ Evaluations of University Teaching: A Multidimensional Perspective. Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, 9, 143-233.
Oliver, R. and Herrington, J. (2000). Using Situated Learning as a Design Strategy for Web-Based Learning. In B. Abbey (Ed.) Instructional and Cognitive Impacts of Web-Based Education. Idea Group Publishing: Hershey USA.
Reigeluth, C. (ed) (1983). Instructional Design Theories and Models: An Overview of Their Current Status. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: N.J. USA.

Rosenberg, M.J. (2001). E-Learning: Strategies for Delivering Knowledge in the Digital Age. McGraw-Hill: New York
Pratt, D. D. (1992). Conceptions of Teaching. Adult Education Quarterly, 42(4) 203-220.
Stewart, D.W. and Shamdasani, P.N. (1990). Focus Groups: Theory and Practice. Applied Social Research Methods Series Vol. 20. Sage Publications: California.
Wachtel, H.K. (1998). Student Evaluation of College Teaching Effectiveness: A Brief Review. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 23(2), 191-211.

Tidak ada komentar:

Posting Komentar